I have read with interest the announcement by the R&A re the above
subject matter and have the following comments.
First with regard to the proposed modification to the ODS (Overall
Distance Standard) for golf balls; I see no difference between this
and the methodology used when the standard was first adopted in 1976.
The fact that Iron Byron has been given a new calibration club, ball
and a higher swing speed which will increase the distance of all the
test balls, the numerical limit of the standard must change from the
present 291.2 yards to something approaching 305 yards if, as the R&A
have indicated, no balls which presently conform will be declared non-conforming
as a result of the modification to the test.
The 'Optimum Test Procedure' proposed by the USGA and discussed
in some detail with the R&A is one of the most sophisticated, relevant,
scientifically sound tests in the world of sports standards but has
been put on the back burner because of some concern expressed by the
manufacturers.
The technology and advanced science exposed during the announcement
of the Optimum Test Procedure by the USGA five years ago, has already
been adopted by every major manufacturer to assist in perfecting their
own ball designs, which says something for the science.
With regard to the club head size and shaft length, the
R&A have at least admitted that even though "traditional and customary"
is an issue, of equal concern is the performance factor. The following
is part of that statement;
"…of equal concern is the possibility
that such clubs may offer undesirable performance benefits. However,
the effects of increasing clubhead size in terms of performance criteria,
such as driving distance and accuracy, is an area requiring further
study."
And also:
"We are concerned that an increase
in shaft length could increase driving distance, but we recognize that
more research is needed."
Instead of making a proposal before they are sure that there
is a problem the R&A has at least indicated that they are conducting
further research and getting more input from the industry before making
the next move. What more can we ask?
Frankly
Frank
To read about the R&A's proposals, visit
www.randa.org